| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Train-of-four and double burst stimulation fade at the great toe and thumb
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03014459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuhji Saitoh, Yasuhiro Koitabashi, Koshi Makita, Hiroyoshi Tanaka, Keisuke Amaha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,736,990
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,066
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,564
of 108,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.