↓ Skip to main content

Consumer–resource coupling in wet–dry tropical rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Ecology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumer–resource coupling in wet–dry tropical rivers
Published in
Journal of Animal Ecology, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01925.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy D. Jardine, Neil E. Pettit, Danielle M. Warfe, Bradley J. Pusey, Doug P. Ward, Michael M. Douglas, Peter M. Davies, Stuart E. Bunn

Abstract

1. Despite implications for top-down and bottom-up control and the stability of food webs, understanding the links between consumers and their diets remains difficult, particularly in remote tropical locations where food resources are usually abundant and variable and seasonal hydrology produces alternating patterns of connectivity and isolation. 2. We used a large scale survey of freshwater biota from 67 sites in three catchments (Daly River, Northern Territory; Fitzroy River, Western Australia; and the Mitchell River, Queensland) in Australia's wet-dry tropics and analysed stable isotopes of carbon (δ(13) C) to search for broad patterns in resource use by consumers in conjunction with known and measured indices of connectivity, the duration of floodplain inundation, and dietary choices (i.e. stomach contents of fish). 3. Regression analysis of biofilm δ(13) C against consumer δ(13) C, as an indicator of reliance on local food sources (periphyton and detritus), varied depending on taxa and catchment. 4. The carbon isotope ratios of benthic invertebrates were tightly coupled to those of biofilm in all three catchments, suggesting assimilation of local resources by these largely nonmobile taxa. 5. Stable C isotope ratios of fish, however, were less well-linked to those of biofilm and varied by catchment according to hydrological connectivity; the perennially flowing Daly River with a long duration of floodplain inundation showed the least degree of coupling, the seasonally flowing Fitzroy River with an extremely short flood period showed the strongest coupling, and the Mitchell River was intermediate in connectivity, flood duration and consumer-resource coupling. 6. These findings highlight the high mobility of the fish community in these rivers, and how hydrological connectivity between habitats drives patterns of consumer-resource coupling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 35%
Environmental Science 40 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#16,191,677
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Ecology
#2,775
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,453
of 248,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Ecology
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.