↓ Skip to main content

Nanomaterials in electrochemical biosensors for pesticide detection: advances and challenges in food analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Nanomaterials in electrochemical biosensors for pesticide detection: advances and challenges in food analysis
Published in
Microchimica Acta, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00604-016-1858-8
Authors

Fabiana Arduini, Stefano Cinti, Viviana Scognamiglio, Danila Moscone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 19 10%
Other 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 55 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 10%
Materials Science 11 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 71 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,547,243
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#723
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,639
of 331,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.