↓ Skip to main content

Risk Perception and Interest in HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men with Rectal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Risk Perception and Interest in HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men with Rectal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Infection
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1260-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie B. Biello, Alberto Edeza, Madeline C. Montgomery, Alexi Almonte, Philip A. Chan

Abstract

Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia infections are associated with significantly increased risk of HIV transmission among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). MSM diagnosed with rectal gonorrhea or chlamydia may benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. We analyzed HIV risk perception, PrEP interest, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) test results among MSM presenting to a publicly funded STI clinic from 2014 to 2016. A total of 401 MSM were tested for rectal STIs during the study period: 18% were diagnosed with rectal gonorrhea or chlamydia infection. Patients who perceived themselves to be at medium or high risk for HIV were significantly more likely to express interest in PrEP compared to those who reported low or no perceived risk (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p = .014). However, there was no significant difference in perceived HIV risk between those who were diagnosed with a rectal STI and those who were not. Although rectal STIs are a significant risk factor for HIV infection, MSM diagnosed with a rectal STI did not perceive themselves to be at increased risk for HIV infection, indicating a potential barrier to successful PrEP implementation in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 24 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 26 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,393,347
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,145
of 3,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,377
of 341,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.