You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular effects of Urtica dioica L. in isolated rat heart and aorta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytotherapy Research, September 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ptr.1087 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdelkhaleq Legssyer, Abderrahim Ziyyat, Hassane Mekhfi, Mohamed Bnouham, Abdelhafid Tahri, Mohamed Serhrouchni, Jacqueline Hoerter, Rodolphe Fischmeister |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| Morocco | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,978,198
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Phytotherapy Research
#2,109
of 3,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,716
of 48,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytotherapy Research
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.