↓ Skip to main content

Exploring speech–language pathologists’ perspectives about living successfully with aphasia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring speech–language pathologists’ perspectives about living successfully with aphasia
Published in
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, August 2010
DOI 10.3109/13682822.2010.496762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyla Brown, Linda Worrall, Bronwyn Davidson, Tami Howe

Abstract

Exploring the concept of living successfully with aphasia challenges researchers and clinicians to identify positive rather than negative adaptive processes and factors that may inform clinical interventions and other community-based services for people with aphasia. Previous research on this topic has focused on the perspectives of individuals with aphasia, and identified a number of core components of living successfully with aphasia, including doing things, meaningful relationships, striving for a positive way of living, and communication. As service providers, speech-language pathologists may also contribute valuable insights regarding components of living successfully with aphasia and factors influencing individuals' abilities to achieve this goal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 29%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 22%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Psychology 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 28 27%