You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fisheries and biodiversity benefits of using static versus dynamic models for designing marine reserve networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosphere, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/es14-00429.1 |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Brown, Crow White, Maria Beger, Hedley S. Grantham, Benjamin S. Halpern, Carissa J. Klein, Peter J. Mumby, Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch, Mary Ruckelshaus, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 53% |
| Scientists | 17 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,449,233
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#393
of 3,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,161
of 294,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.