You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Consuming Good’ on Social Media: What Can Conspicuous Virtue Signalling on Facebook Tell Us About Prosocial and Unethical Intentions?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-018-3999-7 |
| Authors |
Elaine Wallace, Isabel Buil, Leslie de Chernatony |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 49 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 82 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#840,764
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#127
of 3,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,580
of 337,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.