↓ Skip to main content

Injuries of the adolescent girl athlete: a review of imaging findings

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Injuries of the adolescent girl athlete: a review of imaging findings
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-3029-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Shampain, Kara Gaetke-Udager, Jessica R. Leschied, Nathaniel B. Meyer, Matthew R. Hammer, Keri L. Denay, Corrie M. Yablon

Abstract

With the rising participation of girls in sports at both the recreational and elite levels, there has also been increased awareness of injuries common in this athlete population. Anatomic differences between boys and girls cause girl athletes to be predisposed to certain injuries. Certain behavioral patterns, such as eating disorders, also cause problems specific to girl athletes that may result in injury. Imaging plays a large role in diagnosis and ongoing management, but there has been only scant literature dedicated to the specific topic of imaging in girl athletes. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging findings and recommendations for injuries and other conditions affecting the adolescent girl athlete. This article first provides an overview of the key anatomic differences between boys and girls, including both static and dynamic factors, as well as non-anatomic differences, such as hormonal factors, and discusses how these differences contribute to the injury patterns that are seen more typically in girls. The article then reviews the imaging findings in injuries that are commonly seen in girl athletes. There is also a discussion of the "female athlete triad," which consists of osteoporosis, disordered eating, and amenorrhea, and the role of imaging in this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 27 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,751,362
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#147
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,712
of 334,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#8
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.