↓ Skip to main content

Osteoarthritis: a call for research on central pain mechanism and personalized prevention strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Osteoarthritis: a call for research on central pain mechanism and personalized prevention strategies
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4270-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Kristin Valdes, Paolo Pedersini, Pedro Berjano

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the world's leading causes of pain, disability. Symptomatic OA should be suspected in patients with pain in the joints of the fingers, shoulders, hips, knees, or ankles, especially if those patients are older than 40 years. The socioeconomic cost of treating the condition and the burden of the expense is growing with the increasing and aging population. Joint-preserving interventions currently used to manage the condition include joint-protection technique instruction, manual therapy, adaptive equipment provision and instruction, heat modalities, orthoses, strengthening and range-of-motion exercises, adaptive technique instruction, patient education in symptom control techniques, and provision of a home exercise program. Some show potential, but at present, few have a proven ability to arrest or delay disease progression. Recent research regarding central pain mechanisms indicates treating central pain sensitization may be an effective treatment approach. Additional research is required to determine the efficacy of treatment and symptom management of OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,530,891
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,672
of 3,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,862
of 333,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#58
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.