↓ Skip to main content

The polymorphism at residue 156 determines the HLA-B*35 restricted peptide repertoire during HCMV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The polymorphism at residue 156 determines the HLA-B*35 restricted peptide repertoire during HCMV infection
Published in
Immunogenetics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00251-018-1077-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiebke C. Abels, Trishna Manandhar, Heike Kunze-Schumacher, Rainer Blasczyk, Christina Bade-Döding

Abstract

Peptide selection in infected cells is not fully understood yet, but several indications point to the fact that there are differences to uninfected cells, especially in productive HCMV infection, since HCMV evolved various strategies to disable the hosts immune system, including presentation of peptide-HLA complexes to immune effector cells. Therefore, peptide predictions for specific HLA alleles are limited in these cases and the naturally presented peptide repertoire of HCMV-infected cells is of major interest to optimize adoptive T cell therapies. The allotypes HLA-B*35:01 and B*35:08 differ at a single amino acid at position 156 and have been described to differ in their peptide features and in their association with the peptide loading complex. Virus specific T cells recognizing the allelic pHLA-B*35 complexes could be detected, indicating a significant role of this HLA subtypes in viral immunity. However, naturally selected and presented viral peptides have not been described so far. In this study, we analyzed the peptide binding repertoire for HLA-B*35:01 and HLA-B*35:08 in HCMV-infected cells. The isolated peptides from both allelic subtypes were of extraordinary length, however differed in their features, origin, and sequence. For these HCMV-originated peptides, no overlap in the peptide repertoire could be observed between the two allelic subtypes. These findings reveal the discrepancies between predicted and naturally presented immunogenic epitopes and support the need of comprehensive peptide recruitment data for personalized and effective cellular therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#17,987,988
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#1,011
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,623
of 333,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.