↓ Skip to main content

Prokaryotic cytoskeletons: in situ and ex situ structures and cellular locations

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Prokaryotic cytoskeletons: in situ and ex situ structures and cellular locations
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10482-018-1142-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ki Woo Kim

Abstract

Cytoskeletons have long been perceived to be present only in eukaryotes. However, this notion changed drastically in the 1990s, with observations of cytoskeleton-like structures in several prokaryotes. Homologs of the main components of eukaryotic cytoskeletons, such as microtubules, microfilaments, and intermediate filaments, have been identified in bacteria and archaea. Tubulin homologs include filamenting temperature-sensitive mutant Z (FtsZ), bacterial tubulin A/B (BtubA/B), and tubulin/FtsZ-like protein (TubZ), whereas actin homologs comprise murein region B (MreB) and crenactin. Unlike other proteins, crescentin (CreS) is a homolog of intermediate filaments. Recent findings elucidated their localization, structural organization, and helical properties in prokaryotes, thus revising traditional models. FtsZ is involved in cell division, forming a bundle of overlapping filaments that cover the entire division plane. Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy identified tubular structures of BtubA/B that were not previously identified using conventional ultrathin plastic sections. TubZ generates two joint filaments to form a quadruplex structure. After a long debate, MreB, a cell shape determinant, was shown to form filament stretches that move circumferentially around rod-shaped bacteria. Initially characterized as single-stranded, crenactin was eventually identified as right-handed double-stranded helical filaments. CreS, another cell shape determinant, forms filament bundles located inside the inner membrane of the concave side of cells. These observations suggest that the use of in situ or ex situ microscopy in combination with structural analysis techniques will enable the elucidation and further understanding of the current models of prokaryotic cytoskeletons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,530,891
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,754
of 2,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,758
of 333,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,041 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.