| Title |
Management of Lymphomas: Consensus Document 2018 by an Indian Expert Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12288-018-0991-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reena Nair, Abhishek Kakroo, Ajay Bapna, Ajay Gogia, Amish Vora, Anand Pathak, Anu Korula, Anupam Chakrapani, Dinesh Doval, Gaurav Prakash, Ghanashyam Biswas, Hari Menon, Maitreyee Bhattacharya, Mammen Chandy, Mayur Parihar, M. Vamshi Krishna, Neeraj Arora, Nikhil Gadhyalpatil, Pankaj Malhotra, Prasad Narayanan, Rekha Nair, Rimpa Basu, Sandip Shah, Saurabh Bhave, Shailesh Bondarde, Shilpa Bhartiya, Soniya Nityanand, Sumeet Gujral, T. V. S. Tilak, Vivek Radhakrishnan |
| Abstract |
The clinical course of lymphoma depends on the indolent or aggressive nature of the disease. Hence, the optimal management of lymphoma needs a correct diagnosis and classification as B cell, T-cell or natural killer (NK)/T-cell as well as indolent or high-grade type lymphoma. The current consensus statement, developed by experts in the field across India, is intended to help healthcare professionals manage lymphomas in adults over 18 years of age. However, it should be noted that the information provided may not be appropriate to all patients and individual patient circumstances may dictate alternative approaches. The consensus statement discusses the diagnosis, staging and prognosis applicable to all subtypes of lymphoma, and detailed treatment regimens for specific entities of lymphoma including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,808,868
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#46
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,052
of 334,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them