You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multicenter pilot study of subcallosal cingulate area deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurosurgery, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3171/2011.10.jns102122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andres M. Lozano, Peter Giacobbe, Clement Hamani, Sakina J. Rizvi, Sidney H. Kennedy, Theodore T. Kolivakis, Guy Debonnel, Abbas F. Sadikot, Raymond W. Lam, Andrew K. Howard, Magda Ilcewicz-Klimek, Christopher R. Honey, Helen S. Mayberg |
| Abstract |
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been recently investigated as a treatment for major depression. One of the proposed targets for this application is the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG). To date, promising results after SCG DBS have been reported by a single center. In the present study the authors investigated whether these findings may be replicated at different institutions. They conducted a 3-center prospective open-label trial of SCG DBS for 12 months in patients with treatment-resistant depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Professor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 25% |
| Unknown | 51 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 56 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 8% |
| Psychology | 25 | 8% |
| Engineering | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 79 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,456,617
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#321
of 6,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,013
of 243,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.