↓ Skip to main content

Genetic landscape of recurrent ASXL1, U2AF1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and EZH2 mutations in 304 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Genetic landscape of recurrent ASXL1, U2AF1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and EZH2 mutations in 304 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Published in
Tumor Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-4305-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingyun Wu, Luxi Song, Lan Xu, Chunkang Chang, Feng Xu, Dong Wu, Qi He, Jiying Su, Liyu Zhou, Chao Xiao, Zheng Zhang, Youshan Zhao, Saijuan Chen, Xiao Li

Abstract

We determined the biological and prognostic significance of five recurrent genetic aberrations in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A total of 304 Chinese MDS patients were screened for known mutations in five genes (ASXL1, U2AF1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and EZH2) using next-generation sequencing. Of these, 97 patients (31.9 %) harbored at least one mutation in the five genes, and patients harboring these mutations had distinct clinical features. Incidence ratios for mutations in ASXL1, U2AF1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and EZH2 were 11.8, 8.6, 8.2, 4.3, and 3.6 %, respectively. Patients with U2AF1, SRSF2, and EZH2 mutations more commonly had high-risk than low-risk subtypes, while SF3B1 mutations were frequently confirmed in MDS subtypes with increased ring sideroblasts. Cases with ASXL1 mutations had a higher percentage of complex karyotypes, while U2AF1 mutations were more common in patients with trisomy 8 or 20q deletions. Notably, among 124 patients with a normal karyotype, 48 (38.7 %) had at least one mutation. Patients with U2AF1 or SRSF2 mutations had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) times compared with patients without these mutations (U2AF1 mutations: median OS, 18 vs 54 months, p = 0.032; SRSF2 mutations: median OS 11 vs 54 months, p = 0.005, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of SRSF2 mutations was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.039; 95 % confidence interval 1.040-4.000; p = 0.038). These data suggest that mutations in epigenetic modification and splicesome genes are common in Chinese patients with MDS, while mutations in U2AF1 and SRSF2 appear to predict an unfavorable prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,459,237
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#921
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,016
of 285,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#50
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.