↓ Skip to main content

Drying colloidal systems: Laboratory models for a wide range of applications

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Drying colloidal systems: Laboratory models for a wide range of applications
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, August 2018
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2018-11712-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrice Bacchin, David Brutin, Anne Davaille, Erika Di Giuseppe, Xiao Dong Chen, Ioannis Gergianakis, Frédérique Giorgiutti-Dauphiné, Lucas Goehring, Yannick Hallez, Rodolphe Heyd, Romain Jeantet, Cécile Le Floch-Fouéré, Martine Meireles, Eric Mittelstaedt, Céline Nicloux, Ludovic Pauchard, Marie-Louise Saboungi

Abstract

The drying of complex fluids provides a powerful insight into phenomena that take place on time and length scales not normally accessible. An important feature of complex fluids, colloidal dispersions and polymer solutions is their high sensitivity to weak external actions. Thus, the drying of complex fluids involves a large number of physical and chemical processes. The scope of this review is the capacity to tune such systems to reproduce and explore specific properties in a physics laboratory. A wide variety of systems are presented, ranging from functional coatings, food science, cosmetology, medical diagnostics and forensics to geophysics and art.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 16%
Engineering 9 13%
Chemical Engineering 8 12%
Chemistry 4 6%
Materials Science 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,053,296
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#95
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,211
of 335,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.