You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
MobilityMirror: Bias-Adjusted Transportation Datasets
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Big Social Data and Urban Computing
|
| Published in |
arXiv, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-11238-7_2 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-011237-0, 978-3-03-011238-7
|
| Authors |
Luke Rodriguez, Babak Salimi, Haoyue ping, Julia Stoyanovich, Bill Howe, Haoyue Ping, Rodriguez, Luke, Salimi, Babak, Ping, Haoyue, Stoyanovich, Julia, Howe, Bill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 23% |
| Engineering | 3 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,293,793
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#406,013
of 1,011,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,467
of 338,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#12,258
of 24,083 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24,083 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.