You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sliding-Scale versus Basal-Bolus Insulin in the Management of Severe or Acute Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0106505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hasniza Zaman Huri, Vishaaliny Permalu, Shireene Ratna Vethakkan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,841
of 195,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,025
of 237,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,227
of 5,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.