↓ Skip to main content

The comparison of short-term prognostic value of T1 mapping with feature tracking by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
The comparison of short-term prognostic value of T1 mapping with feature tracking by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10554-018-1444-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Chen, Jingjing Wang, Zhicheng Du, Yu-Hsiang Juan, Carmen Wing-Sze Chan, Hongwen Fei, Jiajun Xie, Wanjia Wu, Yulei Zhu, Liwen Li, Jinxiu Meng, Shulin Wu, Changhong Liang, Zhuliang Yu, Hui Liu

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the prognostic value of T1 mapping with feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) imaging in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) during short-term follow-up. A total of 46 patients with severe DCM (LVEF < 35%) underwent 3.0-T CMR with T1 mapping and FT-CMR analysis. The study end-point was defined as a combination of cardiac death, heart transplantation, and hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. The significance of the risk factors was mainly evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox model analyses. During the median follow-up of 13 months (interquartile range 7-17 months), two patients died of heart failure, one received a heart transplantation, and six were hospitalized for heart failure. In the univariate analysis, extracellular volume fraction (ECV) showed significant predictive association with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.62; P = 0.001). No strain parameters in FT-CMR differed significantly between patients with or without events (all P > 0.05). In the multivariate analyses, ECV was the sole independent predictor of cardiovascular events (HR, 1.48; 95% CI 1.13-1.94; P = 0.005). The area under the curve of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic in leave-one-out cross-validation (all > 0.70) further confirmed the predictive significance of ECV. In patients with severe DCM, ECV was not only a strong independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events but also provided prognostic value prior to strain parameters of the FT-CMR in the short term.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Materials Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,571
of 342,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.