| Title |
Effects of hybridization on sea turtle fitness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1101-8 |
| Authors |
Luciano S. Soares, Karen A. Bjorndal, Alan B. Bolten, Maria A. G. dei Marcovaldi, Pedro B. Luz, Rodrigo Machado, Rachel Lo, Stuart F. McDaniel, Adam C. Payton, Thomas B. Waltzek, Marta L. Wayne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,986,310
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#293
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,790
of 336,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.