↓ Skip to main content

LAMA2 gene mutation update: Toward a more comprehensive picture of the laminin‐α2 variome and its related phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LAMA2 gene mutation update: Toward a more comprehensive picture of the laminin‐α2 variome and its related phenotypes
Published in
Human Mutation, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/humu.23599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Oliveira, Angela Gruber, Márcio Cardoso, Ricardo Taipa, Isabel Fineza, Ana Gonçalves, Andreas Laner, Thomas L. Winder, Jocelyn Schroeder, Julie Rath, Márcia E. Oliveira, Emília Vieira, Ana Paula Sousa, José Pedro Vieira, Teresa Lourenço, Luciano Almendra, Luís Negrão, Manuela Santos, Manuel Melo‐Pires, Teresa Coelho, Johan T. den Dunnen, Rosário Santos, Mário Sousa

Abstract

Congenital muscular dystrophy type 1A (MDC1A) is one of the main subtypes of early-onset muscle disease, caused by disease-associated variants in the laminin-α2 (LAMA2) gene. MDC1A usually presents as a severe neonatal hypotonia and failure to thrive. Muscle weakness compromises normal motor development, leading to the inability to sit unsupported or to walk independently. The phenotype associated with LAMA2 defects has been expanded to include milder and atypical cases, being now collectively known as LAMA2-related muscular dystrophies (LAMA2-MD). Through an international multicenter collaborative effort, 61 new LAMA2 disease-associated variants were identified in 86 patients, representing the largest number of patients and new disease-causing variants in a single report. The collaborative variant collection was supported by the LOVD-powered LAMA2 gene variant database (https://www.LOVD.nl/LAMA2), updated as part of this work. As of December 2017, the database contains 486 unique LAMA2 variants (309 disease-associated), obtained from direct submissions and literature reports. Database content was systematically reviewed and further insights concerning LAMA2-MD are presented. We focus on the impact of missense changes, especially the c.2461A > C (p.Thr821Pro) variant and its association with late-onset LAMA2-MD. Finally, we report diagnostically challenging cases, highlighting the relevance of modern genetic analysis in the characterization of clinically heterogeneous muscle diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#2,527
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,650
of 341,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.