↓ Skip to main content

rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology
Published in
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, August 2018
DOI 10.3390/ijms19092473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda E. Kelemen, Madalene Earp, Brooke L. Fridley, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Arif B. Ekici, Alexander Hein, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Ignace Vergote, Mary Anne Rossing, Jennifer A. Doherty, Jenny Chang-Claude, Sabine Behrens, Kirsten B. Moysich, Rikki Cannioto, Shashikant Lele, Kunle Odunsi, Marc T. Goodman, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Pamela J. Thompson, Lynne R. Wilkens, Thilo Dörk, Natalia Antonenkova, Natalia Bogdanova, Peter Hillemanns, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Andreas du Bois, Philipp Harter, Florian Heitz, Ira Schwaab, Ralf Butzow, Liisa M. Pelttari, Heli Nevanlinna, Francesmary Modugno, Robert P. Edwards, Joseph L. Kelley, Roberta B. Ness, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Lester, Sandra Orsulic, Christine Walsh, Susanne K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Julie M. Cunningham, Robert A. Vierkant, Graham G. Giles, Fiona Bruinsma, Melissa C. Southey, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, Dong Liang, Karen Lu, Xifeng Wu, Thomas A. Sellers, Douglas A. Levine, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Edwin S. Iversen, Kathryn L. Terry, Daniel W. Cramer, Shelley S. Tworoger, Elizabeth M. Poole, Elisa V. Bandera, Sara H. Olson, Irene Orlow, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen, Line Bjorge, Camilla Krakstad, Ingvild L. Tangen, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Katja K.H. Aben, Leon F.A.G. Massuger, Anne M. van Altena, Tanja Pejovic, Yukie Bean, Melissa Kellar, Linda S. Cook, Nhu D. Le, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Jacek Gronwald, Cezary Cybulski, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubiński, Nicolas Wentzensen, Louise A. Brinton, Jolanta Lissowska, Estrid Hogdall, Svend Aage Engelholm, Claus Hogdall, Lene Lundvall, Lotte Nedergaard, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Ed Dicks, Honglin Song, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Iain McNeish, Nadeem Siddiqui, Karen Carty, Rosalind Glasspool, James Paul, Ian G. Campbell, Diana Eccles, Alice S. Whittemore, Valerie McGuire, Joseph H. Rothstein, Weiva Sieh, Steven A. Narod, Catherine M. Phelan, John R. McLaughlin, Harvey A. Risch, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Usha Menon, Simon A. Gayther, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Susan J. Ramus, Anna H. Wu, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Alice W. Lee, Malcolm C. Pike, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Agnieszka Podgorska, Joanna Plisiecka-Halasa, Wlodzimierz Sawicki, Ellen L. Goode, Andrew Berchuck, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 7 20%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#22,873
of 44,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,709
of 342,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#331
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.