↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral and physiological analyses of a goal-directed manipulative behavior in the American lobster

Overview of attention for article published in Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral and physiological analyses of a goal-directed manipulative behavior in the American lobster
Published in
Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry), January 2015
DOI 10.3330/hikakuseiriseika.32.132
Authors

Yusuke TOMINA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,040,357
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#61
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,031
of 365,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.