↓ Skip to main content

Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3708 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3484 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis
Published in
Nature, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature15756
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayuko Hoshino, Bruno Costa-Silva, Tang-Long Shen, Goncalo Rodrigues, Ayako Hashimoto, Milica Tesic Mark, Henrik Molina, Shinji Kohsaka, Angela Di Giannatale, Sophia Ceder, Swarnima Singh, Caitlin Williams, Nadine Soplop, Kunihiro Uryu, Lindsay Pharmer, Tari King, Linda Bojmar, Alexander E. Davies, Yonathan Ararso, Tuo Zhang, Haiying Zhang, Jonathan Hernandez, Joshua M. Weiss, Vanessa D. Dumont-Cole, Kimberly Kramer, Leonard H. Wexler, Aru Narendran, Gary K. Schwartz, John H. Healey, Per Sandstrom, Knut Jørgen Labori, Elin H. Kure, Paul M. Grandgenett, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Maria de Sousa, Sukhwinder Kaur, Maneesh Jain, Kavita Mallya, Surinder K. Batra, William R. Jarnagin, Mary S. Brady, Oystein Fodstad, Volkmar Muller, Klaus Pantel, Andy J. Minn, Mina J. Bissell, Benjamin A. Garcia, Yibin Kang, Vinagolu K. Rajasekhar, Cyrus M. Ghajar, Irina Matei, Hector Peinado, Jacqueline Bromberg, David Lyden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 18 <1%
Unknown 3411 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 758 22%
Researcher 578 17%
Student > Bachelor 372 11%
Student > Master 358 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 184 5%
Other 497 14%
Unknown 737 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 926 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 585 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 479 14%
Engineering 114 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 109 3%
Other 400 11%
Unknown 871 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 278. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#130,367
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,520
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,695
of 297,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#199
of 1,153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.