| Title |
Digital technology and human development: A charter for nature conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0703-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgina Maffey, Hilary Homans, Ken Banks, Koen Arts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Malawi | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,567,137
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#266
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,576
of 296,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.