↓ Skip to main content

Trading-off risks from predators and from aggressive hosts

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Trading-off risks from predators and from aggressive hosts
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00265-002-0466-2
Authors

John L. Quinn, Yakov Kokorev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Slovakia 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 76%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,555
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,491
of 131,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.