↓ Skip to main content

Marker assisted selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding

Overview of attention for article published in Tree Genetics & Genomes, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Marker assisted selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding
Published in
Tree Genetics & Genomes, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11295-012-0480-0
Authors

Eda Karaagac, Alba M. Vargas, María Teresa de Andrés, Iván Carreño, Javier Ibáñez, Juan Carreño, José Miguel Martínez-Zapater, José Antonio Cabezas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,468,426
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#84
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,581
of 156,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.