| Title |
A Parent–Child Interactional Model of Social Anxiety Disorder in Youth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10567-011-0108-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas H. Ollendick, Kristy E. Benoit |
| Abstract |
In this paper, one of the most common disorders of childhood and adolescence, social anxiety disorder (SAD), is examined to illustrate the complex and delicate interplay between parent and child factors that can result in normal development gone awry. Our parent-child model of SAD posits a host of variables that converge to occasion the onset and maintenance of this disorder. Specifically, five risk factors--temperamental characteristics of the child, parental anxiety, attachment processes in the parent-child dyad, information processing biases, and parenting practices--will be highlighted. While it is acknowledged that other factors including genetic influences and peer relationships may also be important, they are simply not the focus of this paper. Within these constraints, the implications of our parent-child interaction model for prevention, treatment, research, and practice will be explored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 136 | 59% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2011.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#360
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,414
of 245,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.