| Title |
The Development of Anxiety Disorders: Considering the Contributions of Attachment and Emotion Regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10567-011-0105-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. H. Esbjørn, P. K. Bender, M. L. Reinholdt-Dunne, L. A. Munck, T. H. Ollendick |
| Abstract |
Anxiety disorders are among the most common psychiatric disorders in childhood. Nonetheless, theoretical knowledge of the development and maintenance of childhood anxiety disorders is still in its infancy. Recently, research has begun to investigate the influence of emotion regulation on anxiety disorders. Although a relation between anxiety disorders and emotion regulation difficulties has been demonstrated, little attention has been given to the question of why anxious individuals have difficulties regulating their emotions. The present review examines the evidence of the link between emotion regulation and anxiety. It also explores the unique contributions of attachment style and dysfunctional emotion regulation to the development of anxiety disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 303 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 206 | 65% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 57 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2011.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#360
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,414
of 245,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.