↓ Skip to main content

Robust and efficient parameter estimation in dynamic models of biological systems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Robust and efficient parameter estimation in dynamic models of biological systems
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12918-015-0219-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Attila Gábor, Julio R. Banga

Abstract

Dynamic modelling provides a systematic framework to understand function in biological systems. Parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic models remains a very challenging inverse problem due to its nonconvexity and ill-conditioning. Associated issues like overfitting and local solutions are usually not properly addressed in the systems biology literature despite their importance. Here we present a method for robust and efficient parameter estimation which uses two main strategies to surmount the aforementioned difficulties: (i) efficient global optimization to deal with nonconvexity, and (ii) proper regularization methods to handle ill-conditioning. In the case of regularization, we present a detailed critical comparison of methods and guidelines for properly tuning them. Further, we show how regularized estimations ensure the best trade-offs between bias and variance, reducing overfitting, and allowing the incorporation of prior knowledge in a systematic way. We illustrate the performance of the presented method with seven case studies of different nature and increasing complexity, considering several scenarios of data availability, measurement noise and prior knowledge. We show how our method ensures improved estimations with faster and more stable convergence. We also show how the calibrated models are more generalizable. Finally, we give a set of simple guidelines to apply this strategy to a wide variety of calibration problems. Here we provide a parameter estimation strategy which combines efficient global optimization with a regularization scheme. This method is able to calibrate dynamic models in an efficient and robust way, effectively fighting overfitting and allowing the incorporation of prior information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 241 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 29%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 40 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 13%
Computer Science 28 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 11%
Mathematics 17 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,284,512
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#261
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,963
of 287,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.