↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between Men’s Sexist Attitudes and Facial Hair

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
135 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The Association Between Men’s Sexist Attitudes and Facial Hair
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0637-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian A. Oldmeadow, Barnaby J. Dixson

Abstract

Facial hair, like many masculine secondary sexual traits, plays a significant role in perceptions of an array of sociosexual traits in men. While there is consensus that beards enhance perceptions of masculinity, age, social dominance, and aggressiveness, the perceived attractiveness of facial hair varies greatly across women. Given the ease with which facial hair can be groomed and removed entirely, why should some men retain beards and others choose to remove them? We hypothesized that men with relatively sexist attitudes would be more likely to allow their facial hair to grow than men with less sexist attitudes. Men from the USA (n = 223) and India (n = 309) completed an online survey measuring demographic variables, ambivalent sexism, and facial hair status. After controlling for demographic variables, men with facial hair were significantly higher in hostile sexism than clean-shaven men; hostile sexism was a significant predictor of facial hair status over and above demographic variables; and facial hair was more frequent among ambivalent and hostile sexists than among benevolent and non-sexists. It is suggested that sexist men choose to grow facial hair because it maximizes sexual dimorphism and augments perceived masculinity and dominance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 265. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#139,820
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#95
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,821
of 296,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.