↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Associations Between Conduct Problems and Expressive Language in Early Childhood: A Population-Based Study

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Developmental Associations Between Conduct Problems and Expressive Language in Early Childhood: A Population-Based Study
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10802-015-0094-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa-Christine Girard, Jean-Baptiste Pingault, Orla Doyle, Bruno Falissard, Richard E. Tremblay

Abstract

Conduct problems have been associated with poor language development, however the direction of this association in early childhood remains unclear. This study examined the longitudinal directional associations between conduct problems and expressive language ability. Children enrolled in the UK Millennium Cohort Study (N = 14, 004; 50.3 % boys) were assessed at 3 and 5 years of age. Parent reports of conduct problems and standardised assessments of expressive language were analyzed using cross-lagged modeling. Conduct problems at 3 years was associated with poorer expressive language at 5 years and poorer expressive language at 3 years was associated with increased conduct problems by 5 years. The results support reciprocal associations, rather than a specific unidirectional path, which is commonly found with samples of older children. The emergence of problems in either domain can thus negatively impact upon the other over time, albeit the effects were modest. Studies examining the effects of intervention targeting conduct problems and language acquisition prior to school entry may be warranted in testing the efficacy of prevention programmes related to conduct problems and poor language ability early in childhood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Linguistics 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,277,392
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,094
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,482
of 295,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.