Title |
Die Wurzeln der Idiographischen Paläontologie: Karl Alfred von Zittels Praxis und sein Begriff des Fossils
|
---|---|
Published in |
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00048-015-0130-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Tamborini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 67% |
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 1 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#151
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,886
of 286,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them