| Title |
Utilizing the Cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in Central Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0708-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaoru Saito, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Mutsuyuki Ueta, Reiko Kurosawa, Akio Fujiwara, Hill Hiroki Kobayashi, Masaya Nakayama, Ayako Toko, Kazuyo Nagahama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,568,130
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,200
of 1,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,267
of 299,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.