| Title |
Developing an automated risk management tool to minimize bird and bat mortality at wind facilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0707-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Robinson Willmott, Greg M. Forcey, Lauren A. Hooton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Energy | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,401,611
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#805
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,754
of 298,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.