↓ Skip to main content

Fitness and physiology in a variable environment

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Fitness and physiology in a variable environment
Published in
Oecologia, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2199-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Kimball, Jennifer R. Gremer, Amy L. Angert, Travis E. Huxman, D. Lawrence Venable

Abstract

The relationship between physiological traits and fitness often depends on environmental conditions. In variable environments, different species may be favored through time, which can influence both the nature of trait evolution and the ecological dynamics underlying community composition. To determine how fluctuating environmental conditions favor species with different physiological traits over time, we combined long-term data on survival and fecundity of species in a desert annual plant community with data on weather and physiological traits. For each year, we regressed the standardized annual fitness of each species on its position along a tradeoff between relative growth rate and water-use efficiency. Next, we determined how variations in the slopes and intercepts of these fitness-physiology functions related to year-to-year variations in temperature and precipitation. Years with a relatively high percentage of small rain events and a greater number of days between precipitation pulse events tended to be worse, on average, for all desert annual species. Species with high relative growth rates and low water-use efficiency had greater standardized annual fitness than other species in years with greater numbers of large rain events. Conversely, species with high water-use efficiency had greater standardized annual fitness in years with small rain events and warm temperatures late in the growing season. These results reveal how weather variables interact with physiological traits of co-occurring species to determine interannual variations in survival and fecundity, which has important implications for understanding population and community dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 156 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 26%
Researcher 42 24%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 63%
Environmental Science 25 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2011.
All research outputs
#18,301,870
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,635
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,902
of 239,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.