You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review on clinical benefits of continuous administration of &bgr;-lactam antibiotics*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a0054d |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason A. Roberts, Steven Webb, David Paterson, Kwok M. Ho, Jeffrey Lipman |
| Abstract |
The clinical benefits of extended infusion or continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics remain controversial. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine whether any clinical benefits exist for administration of beta-lactam antibiotics by extended or continuous infusion. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 16% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 25% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 70% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,748,456
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#4,023
of 9,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,736
of 125,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.