| Title |
Gazing into the crystal ball; the future of computer-aided drug design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-011-9487-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Martin, Peter Ertl, Peter Hunt, Jose Duca, Richard Lewis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 23% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 24 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2011.
All research outputs
#3,611,427
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#123
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,726
of 244,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.