↓ Skip to main content

The breeding biology and factors affecting reproductive success in rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome at Macquarie Island

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
The breeding biology and factors affecting reproductive success in rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome at Macquarie Island
Published in
Polar Biology, July 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00300-004-0643-z
Authors

Cindy L. Hull, Mark Hindell, Kirsten Le Mar, Paul Scofield, Jane Wilson, Mary-Anne Lea

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 5%
United States 2 5%
New Zealand 2 5%
Germany 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 36 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 66%
Environmental Science 10 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,426
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,692
of 53,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them