You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complete chloroplast and ribosomal sequences for 30 accessions elucidate evolution of Oryza AA genome species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep15655 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyunghee Kim, Sang-Choon Lee, Junki Lee, Yeisoo Yu, Kiwoung Yang, Beom-Soon Choi, Hee-Jong Koh, Nomar Espinosa Waminal, Hong-Il Choi, Nam-Hoon Kim, Woojong Jang, Hyun-Seung Park, Jonghoon Lee, Hyun Oh Lee, Ho Jun Joh, Hyeon Ju Lee, Jee Young Park, Sampath Perumal, Murukarthick Jayakodi, Yun Sun Lee, Backki Kim, Dario Copetti, Soonok Kim, Sunggil Kim, Ki-Byung Lim, Young-Dong Kim, Jungho Lee, Kwang-Su Cho, Beom-Seok Park, Rod A. Wing, Tae-Jin Yang |
| Abstract |
Cytoplasmic chloroplast (cp) genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nR) are the primary sequences used to understand plant diversity and evolution. We introduce a high-throughput method to simultaneously obtain complete cp and nR sequences using Illumina platform whole-genome sequence. We applied the method to 30 rice specimens belonging to nine Oryza species. Concurrent phylogenomic analysis using cp and nR of several of specimens of the same Oryza AA genome species provides insight into the evolution and domestication of cultivated rice, clarifying three ambiguous but important issues in the evolution of wild Oryza species. First, cp-based trees clearly classify each lineage but can be biased by inter-subspecies cross-hybridization events during speciation. Second, O. glumaepatula, a South American wild rice, includes two cytoplasm types, one of which is derived from a recent interspecies hybridization with O. longistminata. Third, the Australian O. rufipogan-type rice is a perennial form of O. meridionalis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,700,050
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#71,651
of 123,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,536
of 284,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,541
of 2,661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.