↓ Skip to main content

Identification of asymmetric conditional heteroscedasticity in the presence of outliers

Overview of attention for article published in SERIEs, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Identification of asymmetric conditional heteroscedasticity in the presence of outliers
Published in
SERIEs, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13209-015-0131-4
Authors

M. Angeles Carnero, Ana Pérez, Esther Ruiz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Professor 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 33%
Mathematics 2 22%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,827,682
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from SERIEs
#138
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,076
of 279,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SERIEs
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.