| Title |
Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in Guided Invention Activities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7 |
| Authors |
Ido Roll, Natasha G. Holmes, James Day, Doug Bonn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 63 | 31% |
| Psychology | 29 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,790,295
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#65
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,944
of 160,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.