You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrauterine Bone Marrow Transplantation in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mice Yields Donor Osteoclasts and Osteomacs but Not Osteoblasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reports, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.09.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan M. Millard, Allison R. Pettit, Rebecca Ellis, Jerry K.Y. Chan, Liza J. Raggatt, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Nicholas M. Fisk |
| Abstract |
In this article, Millard and colleagues show that intrauterine bone marrow transplantation in the oim/oim mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta yields hematopoietic microchimerism in the absence of donor osteopoiesis or phenotypic improvement. Bone-associated donor cells were not bone-forming osteoblasts, but osteoclasts (bone resorbing cells of the hematopoietic lineage) and osteal macrophages (bone regulatory cells of the hematopoietic lineage). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Russia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reports
#1,673
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,089
of 295,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reports
#42
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.