| Title |
Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Higher Education, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-018-0305-7 |
| Authors |
Bhavani Sridharan, Joanna Tai, David Boud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 63 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 69 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,599,918
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#149
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,906
of 339,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.