You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.04.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David W Gaylor, Lesa L Aylward |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 41% |
| Professor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#955
of 2,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,553
of 61,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.