↓ Skip to main content

Ice-jam flood research: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Ice-jam flood research: a scoping review
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3455-0
Authors

Prabin Rokaya, Sujata Budhathoki, Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 21%
Engineering 5 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,168,912
of 24,898,480 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,273
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,860
of 339,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,898,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.