You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Convergence of Acquired Mutations and Alternative Splicing of CD19 Enables Resistance to CART-19 Immunotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Sotillo, David M Barrett, Kathryn L Black, Asen Bagashev, Derek Oldridge, Glendon Wu, Robyn Sussman, Claudia Lanauze, Marco Ruella, Matthew R Gazzara, Nicole M Martinez, Colleen T Harrington, Elaine Y Chung, Jessica Perazzelli, Ted J Hofmann, Shannon L Maude, Pichai Raman, Alejandro Barrera, Saar Gill, Simon F Lacey, Jan J Melenhorst, David Allman, Elad Jacoby, Terry Fry, Crystal Mackall, Yoseph Barash, Kristen W Lynch, John M Maris, Stephan A Grupp, Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 49% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 47% |
| Scientists | 18 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 753 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 744 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 17% |
| Researcher | 121 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 119 | 16% |
| Unknown | 196 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 155 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 85 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 9% |
| Unknown | 198 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#436,364
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#224
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,957
of 401,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.