↓ Skip to main content

The influence of children’s diet on their cognition and behavior

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The influence of children’s diet on their cognition and behavior
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00394-008-3003-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Benton, ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l.

Abstract

The rapid growth of the brain and its high metabolic rate suggests that it is reasonable to consider whether their diet may influence the cognitive development of children. To date although there are few nutritional recommendations that can be made with confidence, there is a growing body of evidence that diet can influence the development and functioning of the brain. Several lines of evidence support the view that the diet of the mother during pregnancy, and the diet of the infant in the perinatal period, have long-term consequences. The provision of fatty acids has been the most studied aspect of nutrition, although the evidence is lacking that supplementation has long-term benefits. There is increasing evidence that the missing of breakfast has negative consequences late in the morning and a working hypothesis is that meals of a low rather than high glycemic load are beneficial. The aim is to introduce a range of topics to those for whom this area is of potential interest. Where appropriate the main themes and conclusions are summarized and attention is drawn to review articles that allow those interested to go further.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 71 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 16%
Psychology 31 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 81 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,920,396
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#486
of 2,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,054
of 84,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.