↓ Skip to main content

Medicaid expansions and labor supply among low-income childless adults: evidence from 2000 to 2013

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Medicaid expansions and labor supply among low-income childless adults: evidence from 2000 to 2013
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10754-018-9248-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy J. Bradley, Lindsay M. Sabik

Abstract

Medicaid expansions to low-income childless adults could have unintended effects on labor supply. Using 2000-2013 current population survey data, we exploit changes in adult Medicaid eligibility across states to estimate its effect on labor supply for three samples of adults most likely to be affected by changes in Medicaid eligibility: those with less than a high school degree, a high school degree only, and income less than 300% of the federal poverty line. Medicaid eligibility was associated with a reduction in labor supply for low-income women with a high school degree. In our preferred estimations, these women were about 7 percentage points less likely to be employed than similar women in states without expanded Medicaid. Only a modest reduction was observed for weekly hours worked and then only for women with less than a high school degree and who were hourly employees (about 3 h), leading us to conclude that the effect is largely driven by those who leave the workforce. Older low-income women with a high school degree had the strongest negative response to changes in Medicaid eligibility. They were 17 percentage points less likely to be employed in states that had expanded Medicaid, possibly since these women are motivated to leave employment because they lack access to employer-sponsored insurance and have health needs that can be addressed with Medicaid coverage. Men's employment appeared largely unaffected by changes in Medicaid eligibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 20%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#97
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,336
of 337,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them