| Title |
Recent insights into the microbial catabolism of aryloxyphenoxy-propionate herbicides: microbial resources, metabolic pathways and catabolic enzymes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11274-018-2503-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Zhou, Kuan Liu, Fengxue Xin, Jiangfeng Ma, Ning Xu, Wenming Zhang, Yan Fang, Min Jiang, Weiliang Dong |
| Abstract |
Aryloxyphenoxy-propionate herbicides (AOPPs) are widely used to control annual and perennial grasses in broadleaf crop fields and are frequently detected as contaminants in the environment. Due to the serious environmental toxicity of AOPPs, there is considerable concern regarding their biodegradation and environmental behaviors. Microbial catabolism is considered as the most effective method for the degradation of AOPPs in the environment. This review presents an overview of the recent findings on the microbial catabolism of various AOPPs, including fluazifop-P-butyl, cyhalofop-butyl, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, metamifop, haloxyfop-P-methyl and quizalofop-P-ethyl. It highlights the microbial resources that are able to catabolize these AOPPs and the metabolic pathways and catabolic enzymes involved in their degradation and mineralization. Furthermore, the application of AOPPs-degrading strains to eliminate AOPPs-contaminated environments and future research hotspots in biodegradation of AOPPs by microorganisms are also discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,398
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,138
of 330,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.